COMMUNICATIVE SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS LEARNING ENGLISH AS A COMPONENT OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN CALIFORNIA PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-2-4Keywords:
physical education lesson, inclusion, multilingual learning environment, English language learners, communication, supportAbstract
In the multilingual educational environment of California, over 18% of public school students are classified as English Learners (ELs). Although physical education (PE) is often perceived as linguistically neutral due to its reliance on movement and demonstration, effective instruction requires the clear communication of rules, movement techniques, and safety procedures. Language barriers between PE teachers and ELs students can limit students’ participation in lessons and create safety risks. Yet research on the communicative practices of PE teachers working with multilingual students remains limited. Purpose. To characterise the types and forms of communication support used by physical education teachers with English Learner students in the multilingual educational environment of California, with a view to improving coordination between teachers, students, and families at a systemic level. Materials and Methods. A descriptive survey design was employed. The sample comprised 71 PE teachers from various regions of California. Data were collected using an original 24-item structured questionnaire targeting the types and forms of communicative support for EL students during PE lessons. Findings were analysed using descriptive statistics, with frequency distributions interpreted in light of regional and institutional characteristics. Results. A substantial proportion of teachers reported being bilingual or trilingual, with Spanish as the most common additional language. Most teachers relied on multimodal strategies, including physical demonstrations, gestural cues, and visual materials. Written multilingual instructions were used infrequently; digital tools – translation applications, instructional videos, and digital task cards – were applied situationally rather than systematically. Parent communication was conducted primarily through digital platforms with built-in translation features. Significant regional disparities were identified: teachers in large urban districts had greater access to bilingual staff and institutional support compared to those in less resourced regions. Conclusions. California PE teachers employ a diverse range of communicative strategies to support EL students, with non-verbal motor demonstration being the most prevalent. Access to support resources varies considerably across regions. Current practice only partially aligns with the California English Learner Roadmap (2017), underscoring the need to systematically integrate physical education into school-wide EL support frameworks and to develop subject-specific methodological guidance for teachers.
References
1. Голуб П., Когут І., Маринич В. Розвиток фізичного виховання в Каліфорнії (Сполучені Штати Америки). Спорт. Освіта. Здоров’я. 2025. No 2.
С. 15–20. DOI: 10.32782/sports-education/2025-2-3
2. ІНКЛЮЗИВНО ОРІЄНТОВАНІ НАВЧАЛЬНІ СТРАТЕГІЇ ВЧИТЕЛІВ ФІЗИЧНОГО ВИХОВАННЯ КАЛІФОРНІЇ В РОБОТІ З УЧНЯМИ, ЯКІ ВИВЧАЮТЬ АНГЛІЙСЬКУ МОВУ / П. Голуб та ін. Sport Science Spectrum. 2026. № 1. С. 19–27. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-1-3
3. ВІД ОСВІТИ ДО СПОРТУ: МІЖНАРОДНИЙ ДОСВІД ПОСТУПУ ДО ІНКЛЮЗИВНОСТІ / O. Шевчук та ін. Sport Science Spectrum. 2025. № 4. С. 95–103.
URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2025-4-13
4. Clancy M. E., Hruska B. L. Developing Language Objectives for English Language Learners in Physical Education Lessons. Journal of Physical Education,
Recreation & Dance. 2005. Vol. 76, no. 4. P. 30–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2005.10608234
5. Columna L., Foley J. T., Lytle R. K. Physical Education Teachers’ and Teacher Candidates’ Attitudes Toward Cultural Pluralism. Journal of Teaching in
Physical Education. 2010. Vol. 29, no. 3. P. 295–311. URL: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.29.3.295
6. Columna L., Lieberman L. J. Promoting Language Through Physical Education. Human Kinetics, 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781718210462
7. Ethnolinguistically Relevant Pedagogy: Empowering English Language Learners in Physical Education / J. W. Burden et al. Quest. 2013. Vol. 65, no. 2.
P. 169–185. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.773528
8. From Colorblindness to Intercultural Sensitivity: Infusing Diversity Trainingin PETE Programs / J. W. Burden et al. Quest. 2004. Vol. 56, no. 2. P. 173–189.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2004.10491821
9. Gándara P., Maxwell-Jolly J., Driscoll A. Listening to Teachers of English Language Learners: A Survey of California Teachers’ Challenges, Experiences,
and Professional Development Needs. Santa Cruz : Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning, 2005. 56 p. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491701.pdf
10. Gay G. Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. New York : Teachers College, 2010. 289 p.
11. Glakas B. A. Teaching Secondary Physical Education to ESL Students. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 1993. Vol. 64, No. 7.
P. 20–24.
12. Harrison L., Carson R. L., Burden J. Physical Education Teachers’ Cultural Competency. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2010. Vol. 29, no. 2.
P. 184–198. URL: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.29.2.184
13. Hodge S. R., Lieberman L. J. Essentials of Teaching Adapted Physical Education : Diversity, Culture, and Inclusion: Diversity, Culture, and Inclusion.
Taylor & Francis Group, 2012. 432 p.
14. Infusing Sign Language and Spanish into Physical Education / L. J. Lieberman et al. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2010. Vol. 81,
no. 4. P. 45–49. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598464
15. Jana Echevarria, MaryEllen Vogt, Deborah J. Short. Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners. Pearson, 2008. 304 p.
16. Karabenick S. A., Noda P. A. C. Professional Development Implications of Teachers' Beliefs and Attitudes Toward English Language Learners. Bilingual
Research Journal. 2004. Vol. 28, no. 1. P. 55–75. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2004.10162612
17. Krashen S. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York : Phoenix ELT, 1995. 202 p.
18. KRASHEN S. The Comprehension Hypothesis Extended. Input Matters in SLA. 2008. P. 81–94. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27195479.9.
19. Laurie Olsen. THE CALIFORNIA ENGLISH LEARNER ROADMAP REFLECTION TOOL, 2023 https://californianstogether.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/
ELRISE-CA-EL-Roadmap-COE-Reflection-Toolkit-2023-fillable-PDF.pdf
20. Nguyen H. T., Watanabe M. F. Using Visual Supports to Teach English Language Learners in Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2013. Vol. 84, no. 8. P. 46–53. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2013.818432
21. Public elementary school teachers’ positioning in teaching physical education to Japanese language learners / Y. Furuta et al. European Physical Education Review. 2022. P. 1356336X2211049. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x221104912
22. Reeves J. R. Secondary Teacher Attitudes Toward Including English-Language Learners in Mainstream Classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research. 2006. Vol. 99, no. 3. P. 131–143. URL: https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.3.131-143
23. Sato T., Sutherland S. Physical Educators’ Experiences: Teaching Secondary English Language Learners. International Journal of Human Movement Science. 2013. Vol. 7, No. 2. P. 5–28. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001844151
24. Sato T., Hodge S. R. Elementary Physical Education Teachers’ Experiences in Teaching English Language Learners. Education and Urban Society. 2014.
Vol. 48, no. 3. P. 262–287. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124514529327
25. Sato T., Hodge S. R. Elementary Physical Education Teachers’ Experiences in Teaching English Language Learners. Education and Urban Society. 2014.
Vol. 48, no. 3. P. 262–287. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124514529327.
26. Sato T., Walton-Fisette J., Kim I. Elementary physical educators’ positioning in teaching English language learners. European Physical Education Review. 2017. Vol. 25, no. 1. P. 203–220. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x17715771
27. SIOP – Center for Applied Linguistics. Center for Applied Linguistics -. URL: https://www.cal.org/siop/
28. Yoon B. Uninvited Guests: The Influence of Teachers’ Roles and Pedagogies on the Positioning of English Language Learners in the Regular Classroom. American Educational Research Journal. 2008. Vol. 45, no. 2. P. 495–522. URL: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316200.



