FEATURES OF THE MANIFESTATION OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN SKILLED WRESTLERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2025-3-6Keywords:
cognitive functions, wrestlers, non-verbal intelligent, stress perceptionAbstract
The analysis of previous studies which concerning to sport wrestling showed that cognitive functions supported of wrestler’s ability to adequate response on the active from enemy in competition fight. Therefore there is a need to study the cognitive functions of wrestlers that contribute to a decision making during competition activity.Purpose: to study the characteristics to the manifestation of cognitive functions in skilled wrestlers. The 31 skilled wrestlers, age 14–16 were examined. All of the athletes have training in sport club Kremenchyk city. For asses of cognitive functions were used the two tests: on estimate of decision making time and assessing of non-verbal intelligence by Raven’s Progressive Matrices. In addition the perception stress scale (PSS) was used. The athletes were divided into two groups according to the level of subjective perception of stress. The results of the study reveled a significant difference between athlete’s groups by meanings of productively and efficacy in procession non-verbal information. In wrestlers with moderate perception of stress the productively of procession non-verbal information are significant higher than in group of wrestlers with low stress perception. The conducted correlation analysis establishes the presence of compensatory mechanism on prevention of level of non- verbal intelligence in wrestlers. The presents of moderate stress perception in skilled wrestlers is a sign of adequate sense of the external of the environment. This activates the athletes’ ability to make optimal decisions by engaging mechanisms for fast and high-quality perception and processing of non-verbal information.
References
1. Antomonov M.Y. Imitation of Compensator and Adaptive Processes in Biosystems. Cybernetics and computer engineering. 2020. No. 4. P. 57–72. DOI: 10.15407/kvt202.04.057.
2. Barbas I., Aggeloussis N., Podlivaev B., Shakhmuradov Y., Mirzaei B., Tunnemann H., Kazarian S., Center F.C. Biomechanical protocol to assist the training of arm-throw wrestling technique. International Journal of Wrestling Science. 2012. Vol. 2 (2). P. 93–103. DOI: 10.1080/21615667.2012.10878961.
3. Channon A., Khomutova A. Role demands and psychological factors underpinning performance in mixed martial arts refereeing. Martial Arts Studies. 2023. No. 14. P. 39–51. DOI: 10.18573/mas.174.
4. Chernozub A., Korobeynikov G., Zoriy Y.B., Koval V., Grigoriev V., Potop V. Mechanism for assessing the adaptive reserves of elite wrestlers under anaerobic energy supply conditions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2024. Vol. 24 (9). P. 1072–1079. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2024.09230.
5. Cieśliński I, Gierczuk D, Sadowski J. Identification of success factors in elite wrestlers-An exploratory study. PloS one. 2021 Mar 4; Vol. 16 (3). e0247565. /doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247565.
6. Curby D., Dokmanac M., Kerimov F., Tropin Y., Latyshev M., Bezkorovainyi D., Korobeynikov G. Performance of wrestlers at the Olympic Games: gender aspect. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2023. Vol. 27 (6). P. 487–493. DOI: 10.15561/26649837.2023.0607.
7. Ferreira J.S. Decision making and martial arts. International Journal of Operational Research. 2023. Vol. 48 (4). P. 467–493. DOI: 10.1504/ IJOR.2023.135497.
8. Gierczuk D., Bujak Z., Cieśliński I., Lyakh V., Sadowski J. Response time and effectiveness in elite Greco-Roman wrestlers under simulated fight conditions. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018. Vol. 32 (12). P. 3433–3440. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002868.
9. Iliev I. Comparative analysis of personal disposition in Freestyle and Greco-Roman Wrestlers. Trakia Journal of Sciences. 2023. Vol. 21 (1). P. 502–507. DOI: 10.15547/tjs.2023.s.01.084.
10. İsmail K.O., Pakyardim C. Relationship Between the Mental Toughness, Self-Efficacy and Decision Making in Wrestling Referees. Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns. 2024. Vol. 5 (2). P. 178–195. DOI: 10.53016/jerp.v5i2.253.
11. Jia B., Zhang Z., Feng T. Sports experts’ unique perception of time duration based on the processing principle of an integrated model of timing. PeerJ. 2020. No. 8. e8707. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8707.
12. Karninčić H., Baić M., Slačanac K., Penjak A., Jelaska I. Relationship Between Training Experience and Pre-Competition Mood States in Cadet Wrestlers. International Journal. 2018. Vol. 1 (1). P. 9–13.
13. Korobeynikov G., Baić M., Potop V., Korobeinikova L., Raab M., Starčević N., Korobeinikova I., Chernozub A., Romanchuk S., Danko T. Comparative analysis of psychophysiological states among Croatian and Ukrainian wrestling. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES). 2022. Vol. 22 (8). P. 1832–1838. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2022.08230.
14. Korobeynikov G., Korobeinikova L., Raab M., Korobeinikova I., Danko T., Kokhanevich A., Cynarski W.J., Mytskan T. Psychophysiological state and decision making in wrestlers. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology. 2022. Vol. 22 (5). P. 1–9. DOI: 10.14589/ido.22.5.2.
15. Kristiansen E., Roberts G.C., Abrahamsen F.E. Achievement involvement and stress coping in elite wrestling. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2008. Vol. 18 (4). P. 526–538. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00646.x.
16. Latyshev M., Holovach I., Tropin Y., Saienko V., Rybak L., Tolchieva H. Improvement of the Technical and Tactical Preparation of Wrestlers with the Consideration of an Individual Combat Style. Sport Mont. 2021. No. 19. P. 23–28. DOI: 10.26773/smj.210604.
17. Makarowski R. Stress questionnaire measuring emotional tension, external stress, intrapsychic stress, fight-or-flight, and mobilization. Journal of Sport & Kinetic Movement. 2022. Vol. 1 (39). P. 1–10. DOI: 10.52846/jskm/39.2022.1.1.
18. Matkarimov R., Korobeynikov G., Tropin Y., Biletska V., Curby D., Dokmanac M., Kerimov F. Indicators of Spectacle in Wrestling at the 2021 Olympic Games. Slobozhanskyi Herald of Science and Sport. 2024. Vol. 28 (1). P. 38–43. DOI: 10.15391/snsv.2024-1.005.
19. Mayda M.H., Koyunlu A. Comparison of visual and auditory reaction times of wrestlers engaging in traditional and modern wrestling. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports. 2023. Vol. 12 (3). P. 429–34. DOI: 10.22282/tojras.1317739.
20. Melki H., Bouzid M.S. Opposition Game Approach Can Improve Technical Skills and Reduce Stress Levels among Wrestling Students. Idō Movement for Culture. 2025. Vol. 20 (1). P. 87–94. DOI: 10.14589/ido.25.1.10.
21. Pashkov I., Tropin Y., Romanenko V., Goloha V., Kovalenko J. Analysis of competitive activity of highly qualified wrestlers. Slobozhanskyi herald of science and sport. 2021. Vol. 9 (5). P. 30–39.
22. Shokoufeh S., Türkmen M. An Examination of Athletes’ Mental Skill, Aggression and Leadership Levels: Turkish National Wrestling Teams Sample 1. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology. 2020. Vol. 9 (8). P. 70–80. DOI: 10.15391/snsv.2024-3.007.
23. Wilkerson G.B., Fleming L.R., Adams V.P., Petty R.J., Carlson L.M., Hogg J.A., Acocello S.N. Assessment and training of perceptual-motor function: performance of college wrestlers associated with history of concussion. Brain sciences. 2024. Vol. 14 (1). P. 68. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14010068.
