INCLUSIVE PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, CALIFORNIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2025-2-1Keywords:
inclusive education, English learners, physical education, Universal Design for Learning, sheltered instruction, second language acquisition, California education policyAbstract
This article examines inclusive physical education (PE) practices for English learners (ELs) in elementary schools, with a primary focus on the state of California and reference to international frameworks. As the number of EL students continues to grow, ensuring equitable access to PE becomes increasingly important.Purpose. The study aims to analyze educational policy, instructional models, and practical strategies that support the inclusion of ELs in PE, with an emphasis on fostering both physical competence and language development.Methods. The research includes a review of key education policies – particularly the Every Student Succeeds Act and California’s EL Roadmap – along with an analysis of evidence-based instructional models such as Sheltered Instruction and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Theoretical foundations include sociocultural theory, second language acquisition theory, and UDL principles. Practical strategies are synthesized from literature and field-based examples.Results. The study identifies inclusive strategies such as the use of visual aids, explicit vocabulary instruction, cooperative learning, and culturally responsive pedagogy as effective tools for engaging ELs in PE. Curriculum integration models such as CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) and SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol) are highlighted for their ability to foster simultaneous physical and linguistic development. The research emphasizes the critical role of the PE teacher in creating multimodal, linguistically supportive, and culturally responsive learning environments.Conclusions. Inclusive PE benefits not only ELs but all students by promoting empathy, collaboration, and respect for diversity. A comprehensive, integrated approach to teaching PE can reduce language barriers, enhance physical and cognitive engagement, and support academic equity in diverse educational settings.
References
1. Bell N. D., Lorenzi D. Facilitating Second Language Acquisition in Elementary and Secondary Physical Education Classes. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2004. Vol. 75, no. 6. P. 46–51. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2004.10607257 (date of access: 13.05.2025).
2. Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 5, § 11300 – Definitions. LII / Legal Information Institute. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/5-CCR-11300 (date of access: 13.05.2025).
3. California Department of Education. (2009). Physical Education Framework for California Public Schools: Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. Sacramento, CA: CDE. (See Chapter 7: Universal Access, pp. 214–216 for guidance on English learners in PE).
4. Clancy M. E., Hruska B. L. Developing Language Objectives for English Language Learners in Physical Education Lessons. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2005. Vol. 76, no. 4. P. 30–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2005.10608234 (date of access: 13.05.2025).
5. Clancy M. E., Hruska B. L. Developing Language Objectives for English Language Learners in Physical Education Lessons. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2005. Vol. 76, no. 4. P. 30–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2005.10608234 (date of access: 13.05.2025).
6. English Language Learners (ELLs), Academic Language & Physical Education A toolkit focusing on incorporating academic language into strategies to enhance the literacy of English language learners (ELL) 1 Dr. Phoebe Constantinou & Dr. Deborah A. Wuest, Ithaca College, Department of Health Promotion and Physical
7. English Learners – San Diego County Office of Education. Home | San Diego County Office of Education. SDCOE. URL: https://www.sdcoe.net/special-populations/english-learners#:~:text=California%20Education%20Code%2011300%20requires,dELD (date of access: 13.05.2025).
8. Ethnolinguistically Relevant Pedagogy: Empowering English Language Learners in Physical Education / J. W. Burden et al. Quest. 2013. Vol. 65, no. 2. P. 169–185. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.773528 (date of access: 13.05.2025).
9. Making content comprehensible for English language learners: The SIOP model / ed. by V. MaryEllen, S. Deborah. Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon, 2000. 212 p.
10. Ong F. Physical education framework for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento : California Dept. of Education, 2009. 330 p.
11. Shape America SHAPE America – Society of Health and Physical Educators. National Standards and Grade-Level Outcomes for K-12 Physical Education. Human Kinetics, 2014. 136 p.
12. Shevchuk O., Lorenzetti S., Kohut I., Marynych V., Mytko A. Leaving no one behind: a bibliometric review of inclusion in sports. Sport Science Spectrum. 2024; 2: 27–40 DOI: 10.32782/spectrum/2024-2-5
13. Shevchuk, O., Kohut, I., & Marynych , V. (2024). Coaches readiness to work with athletes with special educational needs: a nationwide study based on the COM-B model. Slobozhanskyi Herald of Science and Sport, 28(4), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2024-4.001
14. Strategies for Supporting All Students in Health and Physical Education – SHAPE America Blog. SHAPE America Blog. URL: https://blog.shapeamerica.org/2025/03/strategies-for-supporting-all-students-in-health-and-physical-education/#:~:text=,into%20our%20health%20curriculum (date of access: 13.05.2025).
15. U.S. Department of Education & U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Dear Colleague Letter: English Learner Students and Limited English Proficient Parents (January 7, 2015). Washington, DC: USDOE/DOJ Office for Civil Rights. URL: https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-el-201501.pdf#:~:text=Some%20examples%20of%20when%20the,physical%20education%2C%20art%2C%20and%20music
16. Young, Shawna and Sternod, Brandon M., Practicing Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in Physical Education (November 22, 2011). Journal of Modern Education Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-9, 2011, SSRN. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1963146
17. Маринич В., Когут І., Шевчук О. Бібліометричний аналіз наукових публікацій за напрямом «інклюзія в спортивній неформальній освіті» у базі даних Web of Science Core Collection. Спортивна медицина, фізична терапія та ерготерапія. 2024. № 1. С. 19–26. URL: https://doi.org/10.32652/spmed.2024.1.19-26
18. Шевчук О., Когут І., Маринич В. Організаційні засади реалізації інклюзивності у спорті. Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту. 2023. № 3. С. 86–95. DOI: 10.32652/tmfvs.2023.3.86–95
19. Шевчук О., Когут І., Маринич В. «Колесо зміни поведінки» як інструмент удосконалення роботи тренерів на засадах інклюзивності. Sport Science Spectrum. 2024. № 3. С. 77–84. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2024-3-11
20. Шевчук О., Когут І., Маринич В. Здатність, можливість та мотивація тренерів до роботи на засадах інклюзивності: кореляційне дослідження. Sport Science Spectrum. 2024. № 4. С. 54–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2024-4-8