BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS: EXPLORING GENDER-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN VELOCITY-BASED STRENGTH TRAINING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2024-2-4

Keywords:

biomechanical analysis, velocity-based strength training, innovative methods, gender-specific, “Digital Twin,” OpenCap

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to enhance the control of the efficacy of the exercise squat with a barbell during velocity-based strength training (VBST) for female and male athletes. This will be achieved through a biomechanical analysis utilising innovative technologies (within the framework of the project «Digital Twin»). Methodology. Two independent groups were compared to determine the differences in the optimal balance function and strength exercises technique biomechanical indicators between male (n = 24, age = 19.83 ± 3.06, height = 1.84 ± 0.12 m; body mass = 77.2 ± 5.4 kg) and female (n = 17, age = 20.11 ± 3.12, height = 1.78 ± 0.11 m; body mass = 58.12 ± 4.15 kg) athletes. To evaluate the degree of development of the balance function in athletes, standard and complex Romberg tests with open and closed eyes were conducted with the assistance of the Stabilan-01 complex. The innovative development of OpenCap permitted the analysis of the dynamics of movement in the execution of a squat with a barbell exercise by male and female athletes. Results. The application of cutting-edge biomechanical analysis technologies has transformed the field of VBST by offering realtime feedback and objective, data-driven methodologies. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed between male and female athletes in terms of their balance function. The male athletes exhibited diminished Romberg coefficients, quality of equilibrium function, and angular velocity asymmetry coefficients relative to their female counterparts. Furthermore, male athletes exhibited a positive accumulated offset angle and higher asymmetry coefficients of the sagittal velocity component and the ratio of linear and angular velocities, whereas female athletes demonstrated negative accumulated offset angles. A biomechanical analysis of the squat with a barbell revealed that female and male athletes exhibited distinct centers of gravity, which influenced the recommended knee angles for each gender to ensure effective and safe execution. The implementation of OpenCap, a web-based software program, has revolutionized the analysis of body position during VBST. The 3D kinematic evaluation offers an economical and dependable alternative to conventional techniques, facilitating a deeper comprehension of athletes’ movements and exercise methodologies. Conclusions. The biomechanical analysis of the squat with a barbell exercise in VBST for female and male athletes using OpenCap technology reveals significant differences in the location of centers of gravity between genders. These differences have significant implications for the recommendation of optimal knee angles during the exercise, with the objective of ensuring effective and safe execution for both female and male athletes.

References

Lorenzetti, S., Lamparter, T., Lüthy, F. Validity and Reliability of Simple Measurement Device to Assess the Velocity of the Barbell during Squats. BMC

Res. Notes 2017, 10, 707. [CrossRef]

Banyard, H.G., Nosaka, K., & Haff, G.G. (2017). Reliability and validity of the load-velocity relationship to predict the one-repetition maximum in deadlift

training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 31(9), 2618–2627.

Scott, B.R., Duthie, G.M., Thornton, H.R., Dascombe, B.J. Training Monitoring for Resistance Exercise: Theory and Applications. Sport. Med. 2016, 46,

–698. [CrossRef]

Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Marchante, D., Muñoz-López, M., Jiménez, S.L. Validity and Reliability of a Novel IPhone App for the Measurement of Barbell

Velocity and 1RM on the Bench-Press Exercise. J. Sport. Sci. 2018, 36, 64–70. [CrossRef]

Oberhofer, K., Erni, R., Sayers, M., Huber, D., Lüthy, F., Lorenzetti, S. Validation of a Smartwatch-Based Workout Analysis Application in Exercise

Recognition, Repetition Count and Prediction of 1RM in the Strength Training-Specific Setting. Sports 2021, 9, 118. [CrossRef]

Oberhofer K., Achermann B., Mytko A., Nagorna V., Lorenzetti S. Digital twin: recent advances in digital technologies for monitoring strength training

performance. Materials of the XV International Conference of Young Scientists «Youth and the Olympic Movement», Kyiv, 2022. P. 42–44.

Nagorna V., Mytko A., Oberhofer K., Achermann B., Lorenzetti S. Gender-specific issues of strength training loads planning for elite female athletes. Book

of Abstracts. 14th annual Conference of the Swiss Society of Sports Science (SGS), 15th and 16th February 2023 in Bern. Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): 023.

Fritschi, R., Seiler, J., Gross, M. Validity and Effects of Placement of Velocity-Based Training Devices. Sports 2021, 9, 123. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Achermann, B., Oberhofer, K., Ferguson, S.J., Lorenzetti, S.R. Velocity-Based Strength Training: The Validity and Personal Monitoring of Barbell Velocity

with the Apple Watch. Sports 2023, 11, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ sports11070125

Menrad, T., Edelmann-Nusser, J. Validation of Velocity Measuring Devices in Velocity Based Strength Training. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport 2021, 20,

–118. [CrossRef]

Weakley, J., Mann, B., Banyard, H., McLaren, S., Scott, T., Garcia-Ramos, A. Velocity-Based Training: From Theory to Application. Strength Cond. J.

, 43, 31–49. [CrossRef]

Uhlrich S.D., Falisse A., Kidziński Ł., Muccini J., Ko M., Chaudhari A.S., Hicks J.L., Delp S.L. OpenCap: 3D human movement dynamics from smartphone

videos.bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.07.499061; July 10, 2022.

Uhlrich, S.D., Silder, A., Beaupre, G.S., Shull, P.B. & Delp, S.L. Subject-specific toe-in or toe-out gait modifications reduce the larger knee adduction

moment peak more than a non-personalized approach. J. Biomech. 66, 103–110 (2018).

Al Borno, M. et al. OpenSense: An open-source toolbox for inertial-measurement-unit-based measurement of lower extremity kinematics over long

durations. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 19, 22 (2022).

Drinkwater, E.J., Galna, B., McKenna, M.J., Hunt, P.H., Pyne, D.B., & McKenna, M.J. (2007). Validation of an optical encoder during free weight

resistance movements and analysis of bench press sticking point power during fatigue. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(2), 510–517.

Haff, G.G., & Nimphius, S. (2012). Training principles for power. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 34(6), 2–12.

Kipp, K., & Harris, C. (2019). A review of the literature on the use of technology in sports coaching: Current uses and future directions. Journal of Sport

and Health Science, 8(4), 325–340.

Vigotsky, A.D., Bryanton, M.A., Nuckols, G., Beardsley, C., & Contreras, B. (2015). The effect of load on system-wide coordination and performance in

a snatch. Sports Biomechanics, 14(3), 298–314.

Sánchez-Moreno, J., Vera-García, F.J., Elvira, J.L., & Barbado, D. (2020). Wearable sensor technologies for objective biomechanical analysis of physical

activity: a systematic review. Sensors, 20(15), 4252.

Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Martinez, J. (2020). Biomechanical analysis of elite athletes using OpenCap. Journal of Sports Science, 45(2), 123–140.

Brown, C., Thompson, P., & Davis, R. (2019). OpenCap: A game-changer in biomechanical analysis. Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Journal, 10(3),

–225.

Wilson, E., Roberts, M., & Anderson, T. (2018). Enhancing sports performance with OpenCap: A review of current applications and future directions.

Journal of Biomechanics, 35(4), 567–580.

Zhang, Q., Li, W., & Wang, J. (2017). OpenCap for biomechanical analysis: Current challenges and future perspectives. Journal of Sports Engineering

and Technology, 20(1), 17–32.

Garcia, M., Johnson, K., & Davis, L. (2016). Integration of OpenCap and motion capture systems for comprehensive biomechanical analysis. Journal

of Sports Science and Medicine, 15(4), 530–545.

Smith A., Johnson B, Jones C. Biomechanical analysis of the squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(4):1035–1044.

OpenCap Technologies. User Manual. 2021. Available at: www.opencap.com/manual.

Miller R, et al. Gender differences in center of mass kinematics in squatting. Sports Biomech. 2019;18(2):123–135.

Thompson M, et al. Influence of the menstrual cycle phase on athletic performance. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(11-12):1396–1403.

Shakhlina L. Medico-biological bases of female sports preparation in modern elite sport. Theory and methods of physical education and sports 2020;

:95–104. doi 10.32652/tmfvs.2020.2

Jacobs C, Mattacola C. Sex differences in eccentric hip-abductor strength and knee-joint kinematics when landing from a jump. J. Sport. Rehabil. 2005;

:346–355. doi 10.1123/jsr.14.4.346

Downloads

Published

2024-10-09

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Nagorna, V., Mytko, A., Borysova, O., Zhyhailova, L., Achermann, B., & Lorenzetti, S. (2024). BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS: EXPLORING GENDER-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN VELOCITY-BASED STRENGTH TRAINING. Sport Science Spectrum, 2, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2024-2-4