CONCEPTUALISATION OF THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH IN MODERN SCIENCE AND ITS ADAPTATION TO THE FIELD OF SPORT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-1-4

Keywords:

ecosystem paradigm, sports ecosystem, sociocultural system, complex adaptive system, social capital

Abstract

Contemporary sports research demonstrates a shift from fragmented analyses of individual elements of sporting activity toward a holistic understanding of the interaction of social, institutional, and resource-related factors. In this context, the ecosystem approach is gaining particular relevance, as it enables sport to be conceptualized as a multilevel sociocultural system. At the same time, the scientific discourse reveals insufficient systematization of the integration of diverse theoretical models into a unified analytical framework for studying the sports domain. The aim of this article is to provide a theoretical and methodological justification for applying the ecosystem paradigm to the analysis of sport as a complex social system. The study was conducted in the format of a narrative-analytical review with elements of conceptual synthesis. Peer-reviewed publications indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar were analyzed. Methods of analysis and synthesis, systemic and structural-functional approaches, and comparative analysis were employed. The results. The study establishes that the contemporary understanding of sport within the ecosystem paradigm is based on an interdisciplinary synthesis of theoretical and methodological approaches aimed at analyzing the structural, procedural, and sociocultural dimensions of sporting activity. It is demonstrated that each of these approaches reflects specific structural, procedural, and sociocultural aspects of the functioning of the sport sector, while their integration ensures a comprehensive view of the interaction among actors, resources, and institutions. The study substantiates the relevance of integrating these models for analyzing the mechanisms of self-organization, adaptation, and value co-creation in the sporting environment. An integrated analytical framework is proposed, enabling the interpretation of sport as a dynamic network of social interactions and partnerships oriented toward the formation of sporting and social value, the development of social capital, and the ensuring of institutional sustainability of sporting communities. The ecosystem approach represents an effective methodological foundation for the comprehensive study of sport as a sociocultural system functioning under conditions of multilevel interaction among social, institutional, and resource-related factors. Its application contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of self-organization, adaptation, and value co-creation within the sporting environment, as well as the processes of social capital formation and institutional sustainability of sports communities. The proposed integrated analytical framework makes it possible to combine structural, procedural, and sociocultural dimensions of sports analysis, thereby providing a solid theoretical and methodological basis for further empirical research and for improving sports development policies in the context of contemporary social transformations.

References

1. Адаптивний спорт : навчально-наочний посібник / І. Когут та ін. Київ : Національний університет фізичного виховання і спорту України, 2025. 228 с.

2. Гончаренко Є., Когут І. Роль спорту у формуванні соціального капіталу: від теорії до практики. Спортивна медицина, фізична терапія та ерготерапія. 2023. № 2. С. 10–16. https://doi.org/10.32652/spmed.2023.2.10-16

3. Гончаренко Є., Когут І. Формування міжнародної системи адаптивного спорту для людей з відхиленнями розумового розвитку. Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту. 2022. № 3. С. 69–74. https://doi.org/10.32652/tmfvs.2022.3.69-74

4. Поплавська О. Екосистемний підхід у дослідженні соціально-економічних систем. Сталий розвиток економіки. 2024. № 2 (49). С. 135–140. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2024-49-21

5. Шатіло О. Еволюція поняття «екосистема» та підходи до його трактування. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series “Economic Sciences”. 2025. № 55. P. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2025-55-5

6. An ecological dynamics conceptualisation of physical “education”: Where we have been and where we could go next / J. R. Rudd et al. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2021. Vol. 26. № 3. P. 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1886271

7. Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Model of Human Development / M. Hamwey et al. Academic Medicine. 2019. Vol. 94. № 10. P. 1621. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002822

8. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory. Encyclopedia of Psychology. Washington, 2000. Vol. 3. P. 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/10518-046

9. Domingues M., Goncalves C.E.B. Systematic Review of the Bioecological Theory in Sport Sciences. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2014.

Vol. 6. № 2. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjha-2014-0014

10. Ecological dynamics approach in physical education to promote cognitive skills development / S. Coppola et al. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise.

2024. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 792–802. https://doi.org/10.55860/k7ynwe36

11. Moore J.F. The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Chichester : Wiley, 1996. 297 p.

12. Folke C. Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society. 2016. Vol. 21. № 4. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09088-210444

13. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. World Health Organization (WHO). URL: https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicablediseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/global-report-on-health-equity-for-persons-with-disabilities (дата звернення: 09.01.2026).

14. Golley F.B. The ecosystem concept: A search for order. Ecological Research. 1991. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02347157

15. Guy-Evans O. Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. 2024. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383500583_Bronfenbrenner’s_Ecological_Systems_Theory (дата звернення: 19.01.2026).

16. Kilanowski J.F. Breadth of the socio-ecological model. Journal of Agromedicine. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2017.1358971

17. Kovács K.E. Factors Influencing Sport Persistence Along the Socio-Ecological Model – A Presentation of Sport Persistence Models Based on the Findings of a Representative Hungarian Sample. Sports. 2025. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13040097

18. Odum E.P. Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia : Saunders, 1953. 384 p.

19. Ostrom E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science. 2009. Vol. 325. № 5939. P. 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

20. Ratten V. Sport entrepreneurial ecosystems and knowledge spillovers. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2019. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1691473

21. Seifert L., Davids K. Ecological Dynamics: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Sport Performance, Physical Education and Physical Activity. First Complex Systems Digital Campus World E-Conference 2015. Cham, 2016. P. 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45901-1_3

22. Shao J., Cui Z., Bao Y. Adaptive sports programs as catalysts for social inclusion and cognitive flexibility in inclusive physical education: the mediating roles of emotional resilience and empathy. BMC Psychology. 2025. Vol. 13. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03092-2

23. Sports Ecosystem v0.1: Key Sports Entities Uncovered – Play of Values. Play of Values. URL: https://playofvalues.com/sports-ecosystem-v01-keysports-entities/ (дата звернення: 24.01.2026).

24. Sports Ecosystem. Centre for Sport and Human Rights. URL: https://www.sporthumanrights.org/what-we-do/sports-ecosystem (дата звернення: 18.12.2025).

25. Sports Policy Factors Leading to International Sporting Success: An International Comparative Study. Meyer & Meyer Fachverlag und Buchhandel GmbH, 2007. 200 p.

26. Stanford Center on Early Childhood. URL: https://earlychildhood.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj27426/files/media/file/the-new-ecology-of-earlychildhood-feb-26.pdf (дата звернення: 16.01.2026).

27. Tansley A.G. The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology. 1935. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070

28. The social ecology of childhood and early life adversity / M. Lopez et al. Pediatric Research. 2021. Vol. 89. № 2. P. 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01264-x

29. The SPORTS participation framework: illuminating the pathway for people with disability to enter into, participate in, and excel at sport / G. L. Clutterbuck et al. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2024. P. 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101081

30. Vargo S.L., Akaka M.A., Vaughan C.M. Conceptualizing Value: A Service-ecosystem View. Journal of Creating Value. 2017. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964317732861

31. Vargo S.L., Lusch R.F. Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2017. Vol. 34. № 1. P. 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001

32. Viegas I., Ribeiro T., Santos A. Social barriers to sports practice by people with disabilities: an integrative and critical review in sports management. Managing Sport and Leisure. 2025. P. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2025.2572336

33. Woratschek H., Horbel C., Popp B. The sport value framework – a new fundamental logic for analyses in sport management. European Sport Management Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2013.865776

Published

2026-02-02

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Honcharenko, Y., & Kohut, I. (2026). CONCEPTUALISATION OF THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH IN MODERN SCIENCE AND ITS ADAPTATION TO THE FIELD OF SPORT. Sport Science Spectrum, 1, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-1-4