CURRENT STATE AND TRENDS IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON CANOE PADDLING TECHNIQUE BASED ON A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE WEB OF SCIENCE CORE COLLECTION DATABASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-1-1Keywords:
canoeing, paddling technique, movement biomechanics, bibliometric analysis, scientific profiling, Web of ScienceAbstract
The contemporary development of canoeing is characterized by the growing role of scientifically grounded analysis of paddling technique as a key factor in sport performance and is aimed at optimizing stroke biomechanics, identifying optimal movement trajectories, synchronizing movement phases, and increasing the efficiency of each paddling cycle. The aim is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection in order to systematically outline the structure of the research field focused on the analysis of canoe paddling technique and to identify patterns in the formation, development, and structuring of modern scientific research in this area. The study employed general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, and systematization of scientific information, as well as a set of bibliometric methods. The Web of Science Core Collection database served as the data source. The search was conducted using the key phrase “canoe stroke” with restrictions on publication years (2004–2025) and document types (review articles and early access publications were excluded). The final dataset comprised 140 scientific publications. Methods of general profiling were applied, including analysis of the number of publications, citations, countries, authors, institutions, and journals, as well as elements of scientific mapping to examine relationships between key components of the research field. Statistical processing included calculation of absolute and relative indicators, as well as analysis of publication frequency and dynamics. The results. It was found that 81,4% of publications fall within the period 2004–2025, with a peak in publication activity in 2011. The highest research productivity was demonstrated by the United States (39 publications), Spain (21), Australia and Canada (13 each). The leading subject categories were Sport Sciences (30,0%), Clinical Neurology (20,0%), and Medicine, General & Internal (15,7%). The most highly cited studies focused on biomechanical analysis of the paddling stroke, force characteristics of movement, temporal structure of the paddling cycle, and the application of inertial sensor systems, computer modeling, and machine learning methods. The bibliometric structure of the research field indicates sustained scientific interest in the analysis of canoe paddling technique and outlines prospects for further research aimed at integrating biomechanical, technological, and applied approaches into athlete training.
References
1. Galipeau C. Biomechanical Measurement System for Canoe Sprint Technique: Development and Field Validation: Thesis (MASc). McMaster University, 2018. 125 p. URL: https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/23387/2/Cameron_Galipeau_M_2018July_MASc.pdf (дата звернення: 13.12.2025).
2. Rantalainen T. Evaluation of SmartPaddle® IMU-based system for analysis of stroke characteristics in kayaking. Sensors. 2022. Vol. 22. № 3. Art. 938. DOI: 10.3390/s22030938
3. Trainesense SmartPaddle® validation study. PubMed Central. 2022. Art. PMC35161684. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35161684/ (дата звернення: 13.12.2025).
4. McArthur J. Multi-sensor fusion and machine learning classification of paddle stroke phases in canoe sprint. Applied Sciences. 2020. Vol. 10. № 23. Art. 8389. DOI: 10.3390/app10238389
5. Жирнов О. Удосконалення техніки веслування кваліфікованих байдарочників на основі моделювання кінематичної структури рухів. Олімпійський і професійний спорт. 2007. С. 20.
6. Canoeing Motion Tracking and Analysis via Multi-Sensors Fusion / L. Liu et al. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20. № 7. P. 2110. DOI: 10.3390/s20072110
7. Donthu N., Kumar S., Mukherjee D., Pandey N., Lim W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research Верес. 2021. № 133. P. 285–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
8. Porter A.L., Kongthon A., Lu J.C. Research profiling : improving the literature review. Scientometrics. 2002. № 53. P. 351–370. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014873029258
9. Zahálka F., Malý T., Malá L., Doktor M., Větrovský J.Kinematic analysis of canoe stroke and its changes during different types of paddling pace. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2011. Vol. 29. P. 25–33. DOI: 10.2478/v10078-011-0008-y
10. Runciman R.J., Lyle K. Comparison of the resonance behaviour of ottertail and voyageur style canoe paddles during the J-stroke. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 2013. Part P. Vol. 227. P. 91–104. DOI: 10.1177/1754337112455379
11. Asymmetries in paddle force influence choice of stroke type for canoe slalom athletes / J.M. Wakeling et al. Frontiers in Physiology. 2023. Vol. 14. Art. 1227871. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1227871
12. Wakeling J.M., Pratt J.S., Smieskova S. Stroke technique in C1 canoe slalom: a simulation study. Sports Biomechanics. 2024. Vol. 23. № 12. P. 2499–2509. DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2088401
13. The novel single-stroke kayak test / M.R. Petrovic et al. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2021. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 208–215. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0925
14. The effect of paddle stroke variables measured by SmartPaddle on kayak velocity / A. Löppönen et al. Sensors. 2022. Vol. 22. № 3. Art. 938. DOI: 10.3390/s22030938
15. Using deep neural networks to detect expert event labels in canoe sprint force signals / S. Rockstroh et al. IEEE STAR Proceedings. 2024. P. 205–210. DOI: 10.1109/STAR62027.2024.10635918
16. Biomechanics of canoe and kayak paddling / P.W. Macdermid et al. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019. Vol. 10. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00153
17. Stroke force characteristics in paddle sports / B.B. Gomes et al. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2015. Vol. 31. P. 305–313. DOI: 10.1123/jab.2014-0216
18. A comparison of paddle forces between whitewater and flatwater training in C1 canoe slalom / J.M. Wakeling et al. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2024. Vol. 9. № 3. Art. 167. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9030167
19. Strength symmetry and race performance in C1 canoe slalom / J.M. Wakeling et al. Sports Biomechanics. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1972054
20. Validity of wearable sensors in paddling biomechanics / V. Bonaiuto et al. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20. № 7. Art. 2110. DOI: 10.3390/s20072110
21. Lee M.M., Lee K.J., Song C.H. Game-based virtual reality canoe paddling training in stroke patients. Medical Science Monitor. 2018. Vol. 24. P. 2590–2598. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.906451



